Kratka, M.; Panda, K.; Jedlicka, P.; Bures, P.; Kubat, Z.; Smerda, J.; Marques, A.; Kejnovsky, E.; Zedek, F.

Centromere architecture can determine where transposable elements persist, yet its effects on retrotransposon turnover remain poorly understood. Here we test a chromosome-level "nowhere-to-hide" model, in which holocentric chromosomes, owing to distributed centromere activity and reduced chromatin compartmentalization, provide fewer stable repeat-rich refugia than monocentric chromosomes. We combined genome-wide LTR retrotransposon annotation, spatial modelling and FISH across 40 holocentric plant species and 31 closely related monocentric relatives from Poales, Cuscuta, and Melanthiaceae. Overall LTR retrotransposon abundance and Ty1-copia/Ty3-gypsy composition were explained mainly by lineage history and chromosome size, rather than by holocentricity itself. By contrast, element persistence and removal showed dependence on centromere architecture. Intact LTR retrotransposons were younger in holocentric genomes, and holocentric chromosomes lacked the chromosome-size-dependent spatial clustering of element age observed in monocentrics. Solo-LTR profiles further revealed weaker spatial clustering of removal signatures in holocentric chromosomes, consistent with a more homogeneous chromosome-wide landscape of ectopic recombination. Epigenomic analyses of a matched Luzula-Juncus pair indicated that young elements can occur in centromeric chromatin, whereas solo LTRs are associated with more euchromatic contexts. These results support the nowhere-to-hide model, showing that centromere architecture does not shape LTR retrotransposons accumulation, but their persistence and removal efficiency.